A very strong decision just came down from the Appellate Division, 1st Dept. (Angamarca v. New York City Partnership Housing Development Fund, 115471/04), indicating that a Plaintiff’s immigration status is irrelevant to determining damages and cannot be introduced at trial due to its prejudicial value. The underlying case at issue dealt with a construction laborer where substantial damages were awarded.
The Courts in New York have long wrestled with this issue and in recent years have determined that precluding evidence of a Plaintiff’s immigration status is the most practical way to discourage (rather than encourage) employers’ engaging such workers, since allowing evidence of a Plaintiff’s immigration stauts to prejudice a jury and/or cut down on a compensation award would only increase the incentive for these workers to be hired.
An explanation of the decision (summarized by the New York Law Journal) is available here.
Copyright 2018, All rights Reserved.